Tuesday, April 14, 2015

Use Recertification to Build Your Union

Steward's Corner:  Use Recertification to Build Your Union

 93 97

The Madison Teachers protested Governor Scott Walker's attacks on public employee unions in 2011. Now they have to recertify each year. Photo: Lynn Friedman, CC BY-NC 2.0.
Many thought Governor Scott Walker’s anti-union Act 10 would be a death sentence for Wisconsin’s public sector unions. They’ve been given a high hurdle to clear: every year they have to recertify the union with yes votes by 51 percent of the bargaining unit. Not voting counts as a “no” vote.
But teacher unions around the state, while objecting to a law that ties two hands and a leg behind their backs, have taken the law’s obstacles and turned them into organizing opportunities.
Recertification grants a union legal recognition to bargain with its district—but only over the one topic Act 10 allows, wages. And increases are legally capped at inflation, around 2 percent. Some public sector unions have opted not to recertify, seeing it as pointless when bargaining is so limited.
But half the state teacher locals did recertify this year, including many of the largest districts, such as Madison, Green Bay, Milwaukee, and Racine.
The Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission conducts the votes. This year unionized workers could vote by phone or online, for a two-week period November 5-25.
“We like doing it,” said Milwaukee Teachers Education Association Vice President Kim Schroeder. “It’s a constant reminder that the system is made for us to fail. Even when the rules are stacked against us, we can still win.”
The Milwaukee union won all four units it represents: teaching assistants, substitute teachers, accountants, and teachers. Overall, 70 percent of members voted, and 99 percent of those voted yes.
Racine teachers got 87 percent of teachers to vote, and 98 percent yes. (For “no” voters, there’s little incentive to vote, since not voting is equivalent.)

UPDATE YOUR LISTS

While the law presents a unique challenge that unions in other states and sectors don’t face, the lessons of how to win are the same basic steps as any organizing campaign: list-building, phone-banking, having leaders in every building, and having the capacity to reach all your members in a short period of time.
In 2014, voting began the day after public sector unions tried and failed to unseat Walker in midterm elections, so unions were already in full turnout mode.
The first step is to make sure the list provided by the employer is accurate.
With non-votes counting against you, this is essential. A teacher who’s no longer employed but still on the rolls hurts the outcome. Schroeder said it took a long back-and-forth with the district to get the list fully updated.
On the union side, list updating has become part of the local’s ongoing program, not just something they scramble to put together before the vote. At the beginning of the year, the Milwaukee union gives each building representative a list of employees the union thinks are working at the school. The rep updates the list with new employees and those who’ve left, and returns it to the union office.

ORGANIZE EACH SCHOOL

Having active leaders at each school is essential. If anything, having recertification loom each year motivates unions to build organization.
While the exercise is an unfair bar for unions to meet, it creates urgency that can help unions with an organizing model improve their turnout for their other campaigns, too.
Leaders at both Racine and Milwaukee said it helps to do a big campaign launch. “We had a committee that put the campaign together,” said Al Levie, a Racine teacher who helped lead the recertification campaign. “We created the timeline, the literature, the training.”
Levie helped train all reps on the recertification process. “They took their membership list building by building, went around asking people to vote,” he said. “This year in the first week [of voting] we won the election.” Nonetheless they continued turning out votes in the second week, to get the highest participation possible.
In Milwaukee, leaders tried to make a fun event out of the first days of voting, getting people together for a party at lunchtime or after school. The goal was to get votes in right away, before interest waned.
Phone-banking filled in the gaps when employees couldn’t be reached at work. Unions tracked who reported voting, with the phone-bankers updating leaders at the school sites and vice versa, so they could zero in on those who hadn’t yet voted.
“Once you ask somebody, it’s fairly easy to get a yes,” said Milwaukee teacher and union executive board member Stephanie Schneider. “The biggest challenge is just getting everybody.”

UPHILL BATTLE

While the election results looked good for the teacher unions that participated, winning recertification every year has to be part of a bigger strategy to stay organized.
Statewide, teacher union membership has plummeted more than 30 percent since the law was passed. Not only is membership voluntary, but the law also prohibits employers from deducting dues from employees’ paychecks. The union has set up a separate process for members to pay union dues.
Since the Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission shares the list of who voted (just not how people vote), the union can use last year’s voting results—targeting teachers who voted but are not yet members. In Milwaukee, they do a big sign-up push in the summer.
Unions have to work extra-hard to get people to pay dues, given that they can’t win improvements through collective bargaining. Building membership really comes down to identifying issues that would make people want to join.

FIGHT FOR WHAT MATTERS

Before Act 10, “for a lot of people it wasn’t something you thought all too much about when you sign your contract—it was a given you’d join the union,” Schneider said. But now, “since we couldn’t conduct bargaining like we had in the past, we had to demonstrate the need for the union.”
What’s most crucial is engaging in campaigns on the issues teachers and school employees care about. This year the Milwaukee union fought to raise wages for teaching assistants and to add preparation time for teachers. It mobilized teachers to school board meetings, and engaged with parents and the public.
In Racine, leaders facilitated discussions at every school to identify the issues affecting teachers. The union does take on specific school concerns, but on a larger level, it found the key issue to be the attacks on public schools. The state has cut public school funding across the board, and is diverting remaining funds to pay for proliferating private and charter schools—with devastating effects.
So the Racine union has framed its work as a fight to reclaim the teaching profession. “It’s hard,” said Levie. “People have to see the union as absolutely relevant.”
With no time to recover after winning recertification, Milwaukee and Racine teachers had to pivot into an even bigger fight. Under the guise of accountability, an assembly bill introduced in January would close schools deemed failing based on student test scores, replacing them with charters or private schools in the voucher system.
The unions aim to stop it. Teachers testified at the state capital about the disastrous impacts such policies have had already.
“Messaging-wise, it’s part of the same fight,” said Schroeder. “These forces want to end our union, and end public schools. We show our strength by recertifying.”
This article has been corrected to reflect that teachers unions have set up a separate process for members to pay dues not for donations.
A version of this article appeared in Labor Notes #431, February 2015. Don't miss an issue, subscribe today.
Samantha Winslow is a staff writer and organizer with Labor Notes.samantha@labornotes.org
- See more at: http://labornotes.org/2015/02/stewards-corner-use-recertification-build-your-union#sthash.2WRnfonM.dpuf - See more at: http://labornotes.org/2015/02/stewards-corner-use-recertification-build-your-union#sthash.2WRnfonM.dpuf - See more at: http://labornotes.org/2015/02/stewards-corner-use-recertification-build-your-union#sthash.2WRnfonM.dpuf

Friday, April 3, 2015

Los Angeles Teachers Protest

L.A. Teachers Escalate

 170 40
 
Fifteen thousand teachers, counselors, and other members of United Teachers Los Angeles filled downtown’s Grand Park on February 26 to demand a fair contract for themselves and their students. Photo: UTLA.
Fifteen thousand teachers, counselors, and other members of United Teachers Los Angeles filled downtown’s Grand Park on February 26 to demand a fair contract for themselves and their students.
“I am here to tell you that I am sick of not having enough of anything—especially teachers,” Beverly’anne Ogorro, a student at Dorsey High School, told the cheering crowd.
A week before the rally, UTLA had declared impasse. Its negotiations with the nation’s second-largest school district, L.A. Unified, covering 31,000 employees, are now in mediation.
“I feel disappointed and betrayed by the district. We took pay cuts to help the district get through a tough time,” said Leticia Duggan, a teacher in the pre-Kindergarten School Readiness Language Development Program. She walked the picket line with her six-year-old daughter, a public school student.
“I think the demands that we are making are more than fair,” Duggan said. “We’re not asking for something outrageous. We are asking for cleaner and safer schools, for a payback of wages we lost three years in a row.”
Teachers and support staff lost ground in their last contract, signed right after the 2008 economic crisis and after courts blocked a planned one-day strike. It expired three years ago. A shortened school year and numerous furlough days between 2008 and 2011 also hit members in the wallet.

CLASSES OF 45

After 20 bargaining sessions since the summer, the district has made no offers on class-size caps or staffing ratios. It’s continuing to stand by its offer of a 5 percent salary increase—though teachers have gone without a raise for eight years.
Three thousand middle and high school classrooms have more than 45 students apiece, according to the superintendent’s own report.
“When did it become radical to have class sizes that you can actually teach in? When did it become radical to have staffing, and to pay people back after eight years of nothing?” UTLA President Alex Caputo-Pearl asked.
The high-energy, diverse crowd—educators in red T-shirts, nurses in white coats, students with banners and noisemakers—flooded onto Broadway as the chants grew louder, demanding that the district and board bargain in good faith.
Speakers included rank-and-file members of the negotiating and organizing teams, parents, high school students, community members, and presidents of the National Education Association, California Federation of Teachers, and California Teachers Association. (UTLA is affiliated with both the NEA and the AFT.)
The rally followed districtwide picketing February 12 at 850 schools. Members, parents, and community allies also signed an open letter to the school board, supporting the educators’ 12 demands on salary, working conditions, and the learning environment.

SCHOOLS STUDENTS DESERVE

The contract campaign strategy reflects the vision of the local’s new leaders, who swept into office last March on the Union Power slate. Since taking over, they’ve emphasized member organizing and partnering with parents and the community.
The new leaders have mobilized around a platform they call “The Schools LA Students Deserve,” modeled on a similar initiative by the Chicago Teachers Union. Demands include safe, clean, and fully staffed schools, smaller class sizes, a commitment to arts, music, and physical education, and good salaries and benefits to encourage teacher retention.
Members ratified this platform in a 2013 referendum that called on the union to mount a contract campaign, starting by working with community groups and parents to identify shared issues. It also demanded UTLA put more resources into both member and community organizing and plan a series of escalating actions.
After the Union Power slate won office, this program became the basis for its contract campaign.
Since the union declared impasse, each of its eight areas has begun holding trainings for chapter chairs—the elected leaders at each school site—and activists. UTLA plans a series of escalating actions, including faculty meeting boycotts, beginning March 24.

CAUCUS ACTIVITIES

Meanwhile, the Union Power caucus has been holding its own general membership meetings every month. Attendance ranges from 15 to 40 people.
The ongoing caucus was created after Union Power’s election win to channel energy into member organizing for the demands the slate had campaigned on. Any UTLA member can join. Recent discussions have been zeroing in on which demands are top priorities in the areas of working conditions and learning conditions.
The caucus is also working to engage newer teachers in the union. In February it held a meeting for student teachers and those with one to two years of experience to discuss the contract demands and the connection between social justice education and unionism.
L.A. teachers hope their renewed willingness to fight—not just for themselves, but for their students and communities—will be enough to turn the tide.
“The recession, the cuts to the bones at schools, the attacks on public services, the increasingly savage racism and economic inequalities that our students face,” declared Caputo-Pearl at the February rally, “all of those have set us back, and we’re not going to take it anymore.”
Karla Griego is a UTLA member and a teacher at Buchanan Street School.
A version of this article appeared in Labor Notes #433, April 2015. Don't miss an issue, subscribe today.
 170 40
 
- See more at: http://labornotes.org/2015/03/la-teachers-escalate#sthash.lFFcc6vb.dpuf

Friday, February 20, 2015

ILWU Marine Clerks Local 63 (Port of LA)

The latest actions by the PMA show a blatant disregard for the workers who have built our California’s Port system, for the small, medium and large businesses across the country that rely on stable and reliable goods movement and for the economic security that these Ports provide to our nation. 

Instead of working constructively with ILWU, Local 13 towards a fair and responsible labor contract, the PMA has chosen to unfairly penalize Workers and has shown willingness to sacrifice the great economic recovery currently underway for their own economic benefit. 

The PMA has entered into a very dangerous and unnecessary game. California’s and the United States’ economic security is no game - it is central to our national security and to the economic wellbeing of nations and continents throughout the world. I demand that the PMA reconsider its decision to suspend Port activity this weekend, reopen our Ports, re-enter into good faith negotiations with ILWU, Local 13 and stop being a barrier to California’s economic recovery.” 

ILWU Unions Locked Out by PMA

US Commerce Secretary joins ILWU-PMA talks

U.S. Commerce Secretary Penny Pritzker has entered negotiations between the International Longshore and Warehouse Union and the Pacific Maritime Association, reflecting a ratcheting up of Obama administration pressure on both sides to reach a deal in order to end crippling West Coast port congestion.  
Department of Commerce officials on Thursday confirmed Pritzker had visited with representatives from both the ILWU and PMA, which represents employers, on a trip Wednesday. She joined Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti and U.S. Labor Secretary Thomas E. Perez, who was dispatched by the White House last week to help resolve the contract negotiations.
“She is back in D.C. now, but has been actively making calls to stakeholders with respect to this situation,” a Commerce Department spokeswoman told JOC.com Thursday.
Secretaries Perez and Pritzker Wednesday stressed the importance of reaching an immediate agreement before the dispute causes further economic damage, according to a Labor Department statement.
Before either Perez or Pritzker's arrival on the West Coast in the past week, the White House had balked for months in becoming directly involved publicly in the talks, having said it was confident both sides would be able to work out a deal.
The administration has been involved in the negotiations behind the scenes for weeks, however. The chief executives of the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach told a local trade club in December that the mayors of their respective cities each day had a conference call with the President’s economic team to update the administration on the negotiations.
In recent weeks, however, pressure on the Obama administration appears to have helped spur the White House to act. More than a dozen lawmakers last week signed a resolution urging the president to “use all tools at his disposal,” including the Taft-Hartley Act, if there was a shutdown. Business groups, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Retail Federation, have also urged the president to intervene.
The Taft-Hartley Act would allow the president to respond to an actual or threatened work stoppage of national importance by seeking an injunction requiring an 80-day cooling-off period and a government fact-finding panel. If the dispute remains unresolved after 80 days, the report is made public and workers vote on the employers’ last offer.
Since January, federal mediators have been involved in the ILWU-PMA negotiations, which began in June last year, but they can only facilitate an agreement, not force the parties to strike a deal.
After months of accusing the ILWU of engaging in slowdowns, the PMA earlier this week curtailed loading and unloading on nights, weekends and holidays. Vessel operations were halted coastwide over the Presidents’ Day weekend, reducing dockworkers’ ability to earn premium pay.
According to the ILWU, which denies it’s engaging in slowdown tactics, the move is an “effort by the employers to put economic pressure on our members and to gain leverage in contract talks.”
The ILWU blames port congestion on marine terminals’ inability to handle larger vessels, chassis dislocation, strong volume and other factors.
Contact Reynolds Hutchins at rhutchins@joc.com and follow him on Twitter: @Hutchins_JOC.

Wednesday, December 10, 2014

Bikes Creates JOBS in France, England, Germany, Spain

Indonesian villagers push their bicycles across a bamboo bridge as sun rises behind them outside Yogyakarta city in Central Java.  Indonesian villagers push their bicycles across a bamboo bridge as the sun rises behind them outside Yogyakarta city in Cent
I am a touch late to this information but it seems pretty important. The first large-scale study on cycling's economic benefits was published about a year ago. In it the researchers tried to quantify the economic benefits of cycling. They looked at health costs, fuel savings (oil), the reduction in infrastructural stress to cities (people biking versus using traditional vehicles), reductions in air and noise pollution as well as reduced CO2 emissions. On top of that they looked into cycling and the tourism industry as well as the retail and bike maintenance industry.They found out some interesting, pretty exciting things:
On just two wheels, the industry is creating more jobs than Europe’s high-fashion footwear industry (388,000 jobs), its well-established steel sector (410,000), and the United States’ Big Three automobile companies (Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler) combined (510,000).
Cycling, it turns out, is not a bad way of reducing our carbon footprint, while continuing to grow our economies. Hopefully, studies like this one will provide European (and maybe American) governments/municipalities the evidence needed to up their cycling-related budgets.  

ORIGINALLY POSTED TO WEINENKEL ON TUE DEC 09, 2014 AT 11:44 AM PST.

ALSO REPUBLISHED BY VELOCIPEDE VANGUARD.

TAGS

Sunday, December 7, 2014

Illegal Low Pay for Fast Food Workers

Demonstrators are pictured in front of Domino's Pizza during a strike aimed at the fast-food industry and the minimum wage in Seattle, Washington August 29, 2013. Fast-food workers went on strike and protested outside restaurants in 60 U.S. cities on Thur
Minimum-wage violations are, for instance, suuuper common in fast food.
Steven Greenhouse shows why it's such a shame he's leaving the New York Times (more on that below), with a story on what he politely calls "minimum-wage violations" and others would call wage theft:
The United States Labor Department says that a new study shows that between 3.5 and 6.5 percent of all the wage and salary workers in California and New York are paid less than the minimum wage. [...]
The minimum-wage violations in those two states translate into $20 million to $29 million in lost income per week, the study concluded. Those amounts represent 38 percent of the income of the victimized workers in New York and 49 percent of the income of victimized workers in California.
This has material consequences, as workers who are not paid what they are legally owed are impoverished by these violations of wage laws, and are in turn forced to rely more heavily on government assistance. There's also a fundamental question of respect, for the workers and their time, and for the laws of this nation that say employers are required to pay the minimum wage and, where applicable, overtime.
And we need more reporters covering stories like this instead of centering economic reporting on bosses and billionaires, which is why—circling back to where I started—it's such a shame to see the Times lose Greenhouse.