Sunday, September 7, 2014

Post 9/11 PD Train for Innocents' Cash

Stop  and  Seize

Aggressive police take hundreds of millions of dollars from motorists not charged with crimes  

Written by Michael Sallah, Robert O’Harrow Jr.,Steven Rich

After the terror attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, the government called on police to
 become the eyes and ears of homeland security on America’s highways.
Local officers, County Deputies and State Troopers were encouraged to act more
 aggressively in searching for suspicious people, drugs and other contraband. The
Departments of Homeland Security and Justice spent millions on Police training.

The effort succeeded, but it had an impact that has been largely hidden from public view:
 the spread of an aggressive brand of policing that has spurred the Seizure of 
hundreds of Millions of dollars in Cash from Motorists and others Not 
Charged  with crimes, a Washington Post investigation found. Thousands of people
 have been forced to fight legal battles that can last more than a year to get
 their money back.
Stop and Seize: In recent years, thousands of people have had cash confiscated by police without being charged with crimes. The Post looks at the policeculture behind the seizures and the people who were forced to fight the government to get their money back.
Part 2: One training firm started a private intelligence-sharing network and helped shape law enforcement nationwide.
Part 3: Motorists caught up in the seizures talk about the experience and the legal battles that sometimes took more than a year. (Coming Tuesday)
Behind the rise in seizures is a little-known cottage industry of private police-training firms
 that teach the techniques of “highway interdiction” to departments across the country.
One of those firms created a private intelligence network known as Black 
Asphalt Electronic Networking & Co.; Notification System that enabled Police
 nationwide to share detailed reports about American motorists — Criminals 
and the Innocent alike — including their Social Security numbers, addresses 
and identifying tattoos, as well as hunches about which drivers to stop.
Many of the reports have been funneled to Federal agencies and Fusion Centers as part
of the Government’s burgeoning law enforcement intelligence systems — despite 
warnings from State and Federal authorities that the information could 
violate privacy and constitutional protections.
A thriving subculture of road officers on the network now competes to see 
who can seize the most cash and contraband, describing their exploits in the network’s chat rooms and sharing “trophy shots” of money and drugs.

Some police advocate highway interdiction as a way of raising revenue for cash-strapped municipalities.
“All of our home towns are sitting on a tax-liberating gold mine,” Deputy
Ron Hain of Kane County, Ill., wrote in a self-published book under a pseudonym. 
Hain is a marketing specialist for Desert Snow, a leading interdiction
 training firm based in Guthrie, Okla., whose founders also created 
Black Asphalt.
Hain’s book calls for “turning our Police Forces into 
present-day Robin Hoods.”
Cash seizures can be made under State or Federal civil law. One of the primary
ways Police departments are able to Seize money and share in the proceeds at the
Federal level is through a long-standing Justice Department civil asset forfeiture 
program known as Equitable Sharing. Asset forfeiture is an extraordinarily powerful law enforcement tool that allows the Government to take cash and property without
pressing criminal charges and then requires the Owners to prove their 
possessions were legally acquired.
The practice has been controversial since its inception at the height of the drug war more
 than three decades ago, and its abuses have been the subject of journalistic Exposés and Congressional Hearings.   But unexplored until now is the role of the Federal 
Government  and the private Police Trainers in encouraging Officers
 to target cash on the nation’s highways since 9/11.
“Those laws were meant to take a guy out for selling $1 million in cocaine or who
 was trying  to launder large amounts of money,” said Mark Overton, the police chief
 in Bal Harbour, Fla.,  who once oversaw a federal drug task force in South Florida.
 “It was never meant for a 
street cop to take a few thousand dollars from a driver by the side of the road.”
To examine the scope of asset forfeiture since the terror attacks, The Post analyzed a database of hundreds of thousands of seizure records at the Justice 
Department, reviewed hundreds of federal court cases, obtained internal records
 from training firms and interviewed scores of police officers, prosecutors and motorists.

Civil forfeiture cash seizures

Under the federal Equitable Sharing Program, police have seized $2.5 billion since 2001 from people who were not charged with a crime and without a warrant being issued. Police reasoned that the money was crime-related. About $1.7 billion was sent back to law enforcement agencies for their use.
Amount seized by all agencies (in millions)
$104060100200
  •  Mass.
  •  R.I.
  •  Conn.
  •  N.J.
  •  Del.
  •  D.C.
Select a state to see local agency rebates
Money sent back to local police  for seizures made alone or with others
Note: Table does not include statewide agencies or task forces and only includes local agencies who received more than $250,000.
Source: A Washington Post analysis of Department of Justice data.
The Post found:
  • There have been 61,998 cash seizures made on highways and elsewhere since 9/11without search warrants or indictments through the Equitable Sharing 
  • Program, totaling more than $2.5 billion. State and local authorities kept more 
  • than $1.7 billion of that while Justice, Homeland Security and other federal agencies
  •  received $800 million. Half of the seizures were below $8,800.
  • Only a sixth of the seizures were legally challenged, in part because of the costs
  •  of legal action against the Government. But in 41 percent of cases — 4,455 — 
  • where there was a challenge, the Government agreed to return money. 
  • The Appeals process took more than a year in 40 percent of those cases, and often
  • required owners of the cash to sign Agreements ot to sue police over the seizures.
  • Hundreds of State and local Departments and Drug Task forces appear 
  • to rely on seized cash, despite a Federal ban on the money to pay salaries 
  • or otherwise support budgets. The Post found that 298 departments and 210
  •  task forces have seized the equivalent of 20 percent or more of their
  •  annual budgets since 2008.
  • Agencies with police known to be participating in the Black Asphalt intelligence network
  •  have seen a 32 percent jump in seizures beginning in 2005, three times the rate of other
  •  police departments. Desert Snow-trained officers reported more than $427 million in cash seizures during highway stops in just one five-year period, according to company officials. 
  • More than 25,000 police have belonged to Black Asphalt, company officials said.
  • State Law Enforcement officials in Iowa and Kansas prohibited the use of
  •  the Black Asphalt Network because of concerns that it might Not be a legal
  •  law enforcement tool.   A Federal Prosecutor in Nebraska warned that Black Asphalt reports could violate laws governing civil liberties, the handling of sensitive law
  •  enforcement information and the disclosure of pretrial information to defendants. But 
  • officials at Justice and Homeland Security continued to use it.
Justice spokesman Peter Carr said the department had no comment on The Post’s overall
findings. But he said the department has a Compliance Review process in place for the
Equitable Sharing Program and Attorneys for Federal Agencies must Review the Seizures
 before they are “Adopted” for inclusion in the Program.
“Adoptions of State and local Seizures — when a State and local Law Enforcement agency
requests a Federal Seizing agency to adopt a State and local Seizure for Federal Forfeiture — represent an average of only 3 percent of the total forfeiture amount since 2007,” Carr said.
The Justice Department data released to The Post does not contain information about race.
Carr said the department prohibits racial profiling. But in 400 federal court cases 
examined by The Post where people who challenged seizures and received some money
 back, the Majority were Black, Hispanic or another Minority.
A 55-year-old Chinese American restaurateur from Georgia was pulled over for minor 
speeding on Interstate 10 in Alabama and detained for nearly two hours. He was 
carrying $75,000 raised from relatives to buy a Chinese restaurant in Lake Charles, La. He  got back his money 10 months later but only after spending thousands of dollars on a
 lawyer and losing out on the restaurant deal.
A 40-year-old Hispanic carpenter from New Jersey was stopped on Interstate 95 in Virginia
 for having tinted windows. Police said he appeared nervous and consented to a search.
  They took $18,000 that he said was meant to buy a used car. He had to hire
 a lawyer to get back his money.
Mandrel Stuart, a 35-year-old African American owner of a small barbecue restaurant in
Staunton, Va., was stunned when police took $17,550 from him during a stop in 2012 for a
minor traffic infraction on Interstate 66 in Fairfax. He rejected a settlement with the
Government for half of his money and demanded a jury trial. He eventually got his
 money back but lost his business because he didn’t have the cash to pay his overhead.
“I paid taxes on that money. I worked for that money,” Stuart said. “Why should
I give them my money?”
Edited.... Remainder of exciting article is here:
 http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/investigative/2014/09/06/stop-and-seize/?tid=trending_strip_6

Posted by at No comments:

1% Authoritarianism Hidden by a Deep Fog of Deception

Henry A. Giroux | The New Authoritarianism in an Age of Manufactured Crises

Sunday, 24 August 2014 00:00By Henry A. Giroux, City Lights | Book 

"A Society consisting of the sum of its Vanity and Greed is Not a Society at all, but a State of War." 
Lewis Lapham

Ongoing debates in Washington and the mainstream media over austerity measures, the realities of a Fiscal Cliff, and the ever deepening National Debt have produced what the late sociologist C. Wright Mills once called "a politics of Organized Irresponsibility" - not least of all by obscuring the authoritarian pressures that are intensifying efforts to subvert American democracy.

For Mills, Authoritarian politics developed by making the operations of Power invisible, while weaving a network of lies and deceptions in which isolated issues became disconnected from the broader relations and historical  contexts that gave them meaning. Today these isolated issues have become flashpoints in a cultural and political discourse that conceals not merely the operations of power but also the resurgence of authoritarian ideologies, modes of social control, policies, and social formations that put any viable notion of democracy at risk. De-contextualized ideas and issues coupled with an overflow of information produced by new electronic media make it more difficult to create coherent narratives that offer historical understanding, relational connections, and developmental sequences. The fragmentation of ideas and corresponding cascade of information reinforce new modes of de-politicization and authoritarianism.

At the same time, important issues are buried in the fog of what Gerald Epstein has appropriately called manufactured crises. These crises are designed to stir popular sentiment but actually legitimize policies that benefit the wealthy and hurt working- and middle-class  communities. For example, Epstein rightly argues that the debate about the fiscal cliff is a debacle on the part of the Obama Administration and for Progressives and for Workers and for families. It's a real disaster . . . we shouldn't be having to sit here talking about this; we should be talking about what are going to do about the Employment Cliff or the Climate Change Cliff. But instead we're talking about this fiscal cliff, which is a manufactured crisis.

The fiscal cliff argument - rather than the so-called fiscal cliff itself - is possibly a real crisis in that it serves to divert attention away from pressing issues ranging from chronic mass unemployment and widespread impoverishment to unprosecuted crimes of economic mass destruction and the relationship between corporate predation and the housing crisis and the student debt bomb. And while neglecting the economic impacts on impoverished and middle-class families, this politics of distraction works assiduously to undermine any collective understanding of how economic, cultural, and social problems are interrelated ideologically and structurally as part of an assault by market fundamentalists on all aspects of public life that address and advance the common good.

In such a discourse of disconnection, the expanded reach of politics becomes fragmented. Private troubles are separated from public considerations, thereby narrowing our capacity to perceive the confluence of socio-economic-cultural interests and the prevailing issues of our particular political moment. For instance, the debate on gun control says little about the deep-rooted culture of symbolic and structural violence that nourishes America's infatuation with guns and its attraction to spectacles of violence. Similarly, the mainstream debate over taxing the rich refuses to address this issue through a broader analysis of a society that is structurally wedded to perpetrating massive inequities in wealth, health, nutrition, education, and mobility along with the considerable suffering and hardships entailed by such social disparities.

In this denuded version of politics, the relationships between personal troubles and larger social realities are covered over. Very little foundation remains on which we can build connections between facts and wider theoretical frameworks in order to strengthen the public's awareness of power and its operations. Under such circumstances, politics is stripped of its Democratic elements. Informed modes of dissent are not only marginalized but also actively suppressed, as became obvious in 2011 with the federal Surveillance of the Occupy Movement and the Police's ruthless suppression of Student Dissenters on campuses across the country.

What is missing in the recurring debates that dominate Washington politics is the recognition that the real issue at stake is neither the debt ceiling nor the state of the economy, but a powerful form of authoritarianism that poses a threat to the very idea of democracy and the institutions, public values, formative cultures, and public spheres that nourish it. The United States nears a critical juncture in its history, one in which the rising forces of market extremism - left unchecked - will recalibrate modes of Governance, ideology, and Policy to provide fantastic Wealth and Legal immunity to an untouchable Elite. The politics of Disconnection is just one of a series of strategies designed to conceal this deeper order of Authoritarian Politics. 

In a society that revels in bouts of historical and social amnesia, it has become much easier for the language of politics and community to be appropriated and distorted so as to deplete words such as "democracy," "freedom," "justice," and the "social state" of any viable meaning.  Arundhati Roy captures the anti-Democratic nature of this process in the following insightful comment:

This theft of language, this technique of usurping words and deploying them like weapons, of using them to mask intent and to mean exactly the opposite of what they have traditionally meant, has been one of the most brilliant strategic victories of the Czars of the new dispensation. It has allowed them to marginalize their detractors, deprive them of a language to voice their critique and dismiss them as being "anti-progress," "anti-development," "anti-reform," and of course "anti-national"- negativists of the worst sort. To reclaim these stolen words requires explanations that are too tedious for a world with a short attention span, and too expensive in an era when Free Speech has become unaffordable for the poor. This language heist may prove to be the keystone of our undoing.

From the ailing rib of Democracy there is emerging not only an aggressive political assault on Democratic modes of Governance, but also a form of linguistic and cultural Authoritarianism that no longer needs to legitimate itself in an idea because it secures its foundational beliefs in a claim to normalcy. The undoing of democracy to which Roy refers - and the Dystopian society that is emerging in its place - can be observed in the current subordination of Public values to Commercial imperatives and an increasingly militarized carceral (imprisoning) State.    That is, Americans are now openly monitored and evaluated by an authoritarian system whose ideology, hierarchies, practices, and social formations cannot be questioned or challenged without triggering the full deterrent power of the Surveillance State - the Enforcement arm of the neoliberal financial order. This is a mode of predatory capitalism that presents itself as a universal social formation without qualification, a social form encircled by ideological and political certainty, and a cultural practice that replaces open civic powers with a closed set of consumer choices. 

As a result, corporate predation is emerging as a normalized form of low-intensity ambient Violence that is conscripting all political differences, viable alternatives, and counter-readings of the World into the service of a financial Elite and a savage form of Social Darwinism.

Copyright of Henry A. Giroux (2014). Cannot be reproduced without permission of the publisher, City Lights Books. 
Copyright, Truthout. May not be reprinted without permission.

HENRY A. GIROUX

Henry A. Giroux currently holds the McMaster University Chair for Scholarship in the Public Interest in the English and Cultural Studies Department and a Distinguished Visiting Professorship at Ryerson University. His most recent books include: Youth in Revolt: Reclaiming a Democratic Future(Paradigm 2013), America's Educational Deficit and the War on Youth (Monthly Review Press, 2013)Neoliberalism's War on Higher Education (Haymarket Press, 2014), and The Violence of Organized Forgetting: Thinking Beyond America's Disimagination Machine (City Lights, 2014). The Toronto Starnamed Henry Giroux one of the twelve Canadians changing the way we think! Giroux is also a member of Truthout's Board of Directors. His web site is www.henryagiroux.com.

RELATED STORIES

Education and National Security
By Lawrence Davidson, To the Point Analysis | Op-Ed
Neoliberalism and the Politics of Higher Education: An Interview With Henry A. Giroux
By C.J. Polychroniou, Truthout | Interview
Authoritarianism Has Quietly Enveloped Every Part of American Life,We Must Fight Back
By John Knefel, AlterNet | Op-Ed


    Posted by at No comments:
    Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)